Why Micro-Location Matters

Two apartment buildings only a crosswalk apart can trade half a point differently because of flood risk, school zoning, late-night noise, street lighting, or a bus stop. By measuring yield at the block scale, we isolate these everyday factors and explain price behavior that comp summaries miss, strengthening underwriting, partner alignment, and post-close planning.
Cap rate is not just NOI divided by price; it encodes perceived durability of income and friction costs tied to a specific front door. Trash routes, curb cuts, tree cover, parking enforcement, and pedestrian throughput quietly tilt returns, especially in small-unit buildings and edge neighborhoods.
Proximity to transit lifts exposure but can also introduce vibration, sightlines, and weekend foot traffic that disturb tenants. Mapping one block at a time captures tradeoffs between convenience and calm, clarifying why a corner parcel commands a different yield than a mid-block courtyard asset.
Neighborhood lore often overstates danger or overhypes a coffee shop halo. By anchoring to verified incidents, lighting levels, traffic counts, and maintenance records, we reconcile narrative with numbers, revealing where sentiment discounts overshoot reality and where caution is warranted despite optimistic broker chatter.

Building the Dataset

Reliable maps start with clean, comparable inputs. We assemble closed sales, assessor records, rent rolls, T-12 statements, utility bills, and verified vacancy. Then we normalize for renovation scope, unit mix, and sale timing. Finally, we align parcels to census blocks, avoiding double counts and mislabeled property types.

Mapping Methods that Reveal Reality

Beautiful maps can mislead if they blur boundaries or exaggerate sparse data. We favor transparent symbol choices, show counts behind colors, and annotate uncertainty. Techniques like quantile bins, outlier flags, and block-level labels let readers compare streets fairly without mistaking art for evidence.

Modeling Cap Rate Drivers

Maps describe, models explain. We test relationships between yield and factors like building age, unit size, sponsor reputation proxied by completion history, renovation depth, school scores, crime trends, tree canopy, and transit access. Spatial lags capture neighbor effects; random intercepts absorb block idiosyncrasies without overfitting hero properties.

From Map to Action

Insight matters only if it shapes behavior. We turn micro-yield patterns into sourcing lists, comp discipline, lender dialogues, and operating plans. Acquisition teams balance speed with patience; asset managers prioritize renovations block by block; partners track progress against the very streets that justified the business plan.

Beware the noisy comp

Some transactions include atypical motivations: tax-swap timing, condo conversions, partnership dissolutions, or 1031 pressure. We flag these and show sensitivity without them, preventing a single strange price from warping an entire corridor’s perceived yield and tempting teams to chase ghosts during underwriting.

When a boundary hides a cliff

Block lines do not always reflect lived experience. A bike lane, new street trees, or a recently closed nightclub can tip sentiment quickly. We pair polygons with diaries and resident interviews, catching sudden shifts that spreadsheets miss until the next sales cycle arrives.

A short story from a Saturday walk

We once mapped a quiet block as premium until a weekend visit revealed delivery trucks idling behind a popular brunch spot, filling units with fumes. After documenting schedules and building ventilation, our cap rate adjusted, and our interest shifted one street over, saving costly regret.
Xarnophelivasto
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.